Sunday, October 12, 2008     Register | Login | Search | Contact Us
     

Many of you already received communications about the move of the Cadence user community into cadence.com. And many of you have already joined, with over 4000 registrations in the first two weeks.

The new Cadence Community enhances the ability of Cadence users to connect and collaborate. In addition to moving the community into cadence.com -- enabling single sign-on for community, Sourcelink and Cadence events -- the new site is organized around nine technology segments, giving you easy access to product information, training, forums and blogs. Some of the new features include:
  • Ability to respond to posts via e-mail
  • Technology-specific blogs
  • Latest Web 2.0 social networking capabilities
  • Public profile options
  • Private messaging
  • Friends lists
Visit the new Cadence Community today at www.cadence.com/community and join the discussions!

Registration note: Due to the scope of the enhancements and the new SSO registration system, we were not able to migrate existing cdnusers.org member accounts. So new registrations are required, but this enables a broader set of functionality we think you'll enjoy.

Forum note: Under the guidance of forum moderators, we have taken the 20+ cdnusers.org forums and consolidated them into 11 forums on the new site. Posts have been brought over so you can leverage that posting history. CDNusers forums will be set to read only starting 7/30, and cdnusers.org will be redirected to the new community on 8/4.

Best regards,
Mike and Tom

Michael A. Catrambone - Steering Committee Chairman
Distinguished Engineer
PCB/Mechanical
UTStarcom, Inc.

Tom Diederich
Cadence Community Manager
Home
Forums
Subject: Non-equivalences due to different device.
Posting to forums is available to community members only.
Login or Register
Rate this topic:
   
Author Messages
caddina
Posts: 6
Online: User is Offline
3/10/2008 6:20 AM  

Hi,

I have performed Equivalence check (Using Encounter CONFORMAL (R)  Version 07.10-s140 )  between two verilog netlists generated by two different Quartus Versions targeting two different ALTERA devices.

 Devices Used :

  • Stratix ( EP1S30F780I6) used for Revised netlist.
  • Stratix II ( EP2S30F484I4) used for Golden netlist.

 Quartus Versions Used:

* Version 5.1 Build 176 10/26/2005 Service Pack 0.15 SJ ( For Stratix, Revised Netlist ).
* Version 6.1 Build 201 11/27/2006 SJ Full Version ( For STRATIX II, Golden Netlist)

Here netlist refers to Verilog Formal verification O/P Netlist  generated by Quartus tool on both sides.

There were non-equivalences generated due to architecture differences of different devices. Please note that there were  no changes in RTL's used, except the modification done on soft macro's with respect to device.

Observation of Errors:
STRATIXII device drives clock output of the PLL to CLOCK CONTROL BUFFER which in turn drives clock output into design blocks. Whereas STRATIX device  doesn’t use CLOCK CONTROL Buffer and clock output of PLL is directly driven to design blocks.

I understood that there will be differences; however i would like to know if there are any Conformal Settings or Commands related to these devices to resolve non equivalences.

Please find the script attached that was used for performing LEC Verification. Extract of Non-equivalence error report is attached as well .

Kindly give your suggestions and comments and feel free to ask me if you require further inputs.

Thanks in advance,
Warm regards,

Dina.


Attachment: Script and Error report.zip

croy
Posts: 54
Online: User is Offline
3/17/2008 8:21 AM  
Hi Dina

I can't tell from the piece of log attached what's going on. Please open an SR through http://sourcelink.cadence.com and attach the full log.

Is clock control buffer a black-box? If it is then that would be a problem for EC. You need to have a correct model for it or, if you're absolutely certain that the 2 nets are the same then you could use 'add primary input' on them to put as PI's. All that would be left is to do 'add mapped point'.

BTW You would probably have an easier time doing 2 RTL-gate runs than 1 gate-gate. This was discussed in the tip of the month posted on 6/13/2007 on this forum.

Chrystian
Posting to forums is available to community members only.
Login or Register

Forums > Digital IC > Formal verification > Non-equivalences due to different device.


ActiveForums 3.6
     
Copyright 2006 Cadence Design Systems, Inc.