Monday, October 06, 2008     Register | Login | Search | Contact Us
     

Many of you already received communications about the move of the Cadence user community into cadence.com. And many of you have already joined, with over 4000 registrations in the first two weeks.

The new Cadence Community enhances the ability of Cadence users to connect and collaborate. In addition to moving the community into cadence.com -- enabling single sign-on for community, Sourcelink and Cadence events -- the new site is organized around nine technology segments, giving you easy access to product information, training, forums and blogs. Some of the new features include:
  • Ability to respond to posts via e-mail
  • Technology-specific blogs
  • Latest Web 2.0 social networking capabilities
  • Public profile options
  • Private messaging
  • Friends lists
Visit the new Cadence Community today at www.cadence.com/community and join the discussions!

Registration note: Due to the scope of the enhancements and the new SSO registration system, we were not able to migrate existing cdnusers.org member accounts. So new registrations are required, but this enables a broader set of functionality we think you'll enjoy.

Forum note: Under the guidance of forum moderators, we have taken the 20+ cdnusers.org forums and consolidated them into 11 forums on the new site. Posts have been brought over so you can leverage that posting history. CDNusers forums will be set to read only starting 7/30, and cdnusers.org will be redirected to the new community on 8/4.

Best regards,
Mike and Tom

Michael A. Catrambone - Steering Committee Chairman
Distinguished Engineer
PCB/Mechanical
UTStarcom, Inc.

Tom Diederich
Cadence Community Manager
Home
Forums
Subject: LVS Matching error
Posting to forums is available to community members only.
Login or Register
Rate this topic:
   
Author Messages
isazul
Posts: 26
Online: User is Offline
3/05/2008 8:56 AM  
Hi everybody
I'm using Diva from Cadence to run LVS.
I get many nets and devices mismatch when running an LVS. This is due to M factor of mos transistor, and also because I draw my MOS transistors in Layout using multifingered design. I thought LVS didn't recognize parallel device, but
I checked DivaLVS.rul file and parallel simplification seems to be set by permuteDevice statement. (permuteDevice parallel "nfet")......)
Have anyone been faced to this problem and could help me resolve this???

any help will be very appreciated thanks!!!!
adbeckett
Posts: 248
Online: User is Offline
3/05/2008 9:00 AM  
Well, it rather depends on what the function that is being used in the permuteDevice() is doing. This will be a SKILL function, and it needs to take into account the w, l and m of the transistors being combined appropriately, otherwise you'll get parameter mismatches. If it only looks at w and l, then it's not going to work properly...

Regards,

Andrew.
isazul
Posts: 26
Online: User is Offline
3/05/2008 9:15 AM  
This is the DivaLVS rules file I  use.
 Are the pemuteDevice statement wrong??

Thanks

Attachment: divaLVS_Rules.doc

adbeckett
Posts: 248
Online: User is Offline
3/05/2008 9:25 AM  
Not sure why you had to put the rule file into a Word document - a text file would be sufficient - just makes it harder to read...

Anyway, from a quick glance through the file, it appears to be checking and combining m.

So I would suggest you check with whoever you get the design kit and rules from, or contact Cadence customer support. Most likely they'll need to see the design data to see what's wrong - it's hard to figure it out without seeing the whole picture.

There's no fundamental tool reason why this shouldn't work. You might want to also check that the netlists you're getting for both the schematic and layout have the parameters w,l and m in them for these transistors (you can access these netlists from the LVS form).

Regards,

Andrew.
Posting to forums is available to community members only.
Login or Register



ActiveForums 3.6
     
Copyright 2006 Cadence Design Systems, Inc.