Thursday, January 08, 2009     Register | Login | Search | Contact Us
     

Many of you already received communications about the move of the Cadence user community into cadence.com. And many of you have already joined, with over 4000 registrations in the first two weeks.

The new Cadence Community enhances the ability of Cadence users to connect and collaborate. In addition to moving the community into cadence.com -- enabling single sign-on for community, Sourcelink and Cadence events -- the new site is organized around nine technology segments, giving you easy access to product information, training, forums and blogs. Some of the new features include:
  • Ability to respond to posts via e-mail
  • Technology-specific blogs
  • Latest Web 2.0 social networking capabilities
  • Public profile options
  • Private messaging
  • Friends lists
Visit the new Cadence Community today at www.cadence.com/community and join the discussions!

Registration note: Due to the scope of the enhancements and the new SSO registration system, we were not able to migrate existing cdnusers.org member accounts. So new registrations are required, but this enables a broader set of functionality we think you'll enjoy.

Forum note: Under the guidance of forum moderators, we have taken the 20+ cdnusers.org forums and consolidated them into 11 forums on the new site. Posts have been brought over so you can leverage that posting history. CDNusers forums will be set to read only starting 7/30, and cdnusers.org will be redirected to the new community on 8/4.

Best regards,
Mike and Tom

Michael A. Catrambone - Steering Committee Chairman
Distinguished Engineer
PCB/Mechanical
UTStarcom, Inc.

Tom Diederich
Cadence Community Manager
Home
Forums
Subject: What do you think of the new OVM announcement?
Posting to forums is available to community members only.
Login or Register
Rate this topic:
   
Author Messages
umer
Posts: 7
Online: User is Offline
8/16/2007 11:11 AM  

Hello,

In case you missed the biggest news affecting SystemVerilog adoption, here it is. Today, Mentor and Cadence announced an intent to jointly develop a SystemVerilog methodology that is truly portable across multiple simulators and provides a very capable library for building highly automated and reusable verification environments.

Here's the full press release -> http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070816/20070816005160.html?.v=1

Curious to see what users think of this new development.

Umer Yousafzai

CoreComp Senior Technical Lead

Cadence

bryan
Posts: 25
Online: User is Offline
8/16/2007 2:29 PM  
I liked it. I think it will move SV forward more quickly and will help with the logistics from a users perspective.

Regards,
Bryan
dl_doulos
Posts: 9
Online: User is Offline
8/16/2007 4:18 PM  
We think it is a positive step that will encourage more current VHDL/Verilog users to consider adopting SystemVerilog as their verification language.

As independent providers of SystemVerilog language and methodology training, one of our biggest headaches over the past couple of years has been producing training materials that are applicable to and work with multiple vendor tools. We have also found it necessary to create methodology-specific SystemVerilog courses for both AVM and URM. If the OVM announcement means that IUS and QuestaSim will both support a similar subset of the  p1800 standard in in the near future, this could make our life a whole lot easier.

We have been told that OVM will be backwards-compatible with AVM 3.1 and URM 6.2. I haven't seen the source code yet but this seems to imply an implementation of URM based on the AVM classes? I have a few other questions related to the implementation:

1) How much of the current URM will become part of OVM?
2) Will OVM support the same set of foreign languane interfaces (e.g. will integrating an e TB module change/still work)?
3) Will development of non SV modules (e.g. e) continue alongside OVM?
4) When is IUS 6.2 due?

Regards,
Dave


David Long
Doulos
www.doulos.com
mstellfox
Posts: 9
Online: User is Offline
8/20/2007 6:34 PM  
Hi David,

We are actively working with Mentor on the technical details, but in response to your questions:

[quoteΣ) How much of the current URM will become part of OVM?[/quote]
All of the current URM SystemVerilog Class-based methodology will become part of OVM, so existing URM users will be able to seamlessly transition to OVM. More importantly, any URM VIP that is developed will be interoperable with the rest of the world that adopts OVM.

[quoteΤ) Will OVM support the same set of foreign languane interfaces (e.g. will integrating an e TB module change/still work)?[/quote]
Cadence and Mentor have both been providing multi-language verification tool & methodology support and we definitely plan to make sure that OVM will provide at least the same level of support as Mentor provides today with SystemC and Cadence provides with e and SystemC. This will enable users to reuse their SystemVerilog VIP to connect to both RTL and SystemC TLM models, and enable plug & play VIP between OVM SystemVerilog VIP and eRM VIP.

[quoteΥ) Will development of non SV modules (e.g. e) continue alongside OVM?[/quote]
The short answer is yes. As you know, there is a lot more to verification beyond SystemVerilog testbenches. At Cadence we have developed the Incisive Plan to Closure Methodology (IPCM) which is a complete methodology spanning block to system level verification, from verification planning to coverage closure, and includes assertions, coverage-driven testbench reuse, and SystemC TLM, HW/SW co-verification, and Hardware-assisted system verification. URM has been a key component of IPCM for developing reusable SystemVerilog and e coverage-driven testbenches, and since OVM will be a superset of URM, we fully plan to make sure that OVM fits within IPCM. To your specific question about e, we continue to evolve the e Reuse Methodology, and we will make sure that eRM VIP will plug & play with SystemVerilog OVM VIP.

[quoteΦ) When is IUS 6.2 due?[/quote]
6.2 is planned to be release in November.
witlox
Posts: 1
Online: User is Offline
8/21/2007 12:52 AM  
Hello,

Why not synopsys?

Regards,
Roger

Roger Witlox
mstellfox
Posts: 9
Online: User is Offline
8/21/2007 7:34 AM  
[quote]Why not synopsys?[/quote]

Hi Roger,
OVM will be truly open-source and based 100% on IEEE1800, so Synopsys and any other vendor that supports the SystemVerilog standard will be able to access and run OVM and OVM-based VIP.
Posting to forums is available to community members only.
Login or Register

Forums > Functional Verification > SystemVerilog > What do you think of the new OVM announcement?


ActiveForums 3.6
     
Copyright 2006 Cadence Design Systems, Inc.